Presentation of Self in Everyday Life Essay

A Canadian-Ameri bum sociologist/writer named Erving Goff public, proposed the dramaturgical perspective or the scheme of theater in his book The Presentation of Self in universal Life, in dedicate to explain the behavior of people. The book catered the interest of homophiley a(prenominal) readers as it was published initially in 1956. Not only mentioning the fortunate integration of the dramaturgical approach as a major percentage in Sociology, Goffman, was also criticized for the detr setion of such authentic-written style of research he used as compared to the conventional researches that was used by many researchers and proponents of many theories.Goffman, as a competent and keen observant, combined different theories link to support and create his new theory of dramaturgy (Sannicolas, 1997). Moreover, the focus of this root then, is to discuss the relevance of dramaturgy in everyday scenario of a mans real life. Body Dramaturgy is a term popularized by sociologist, Erv ing Goffman, pertaining to the study of mechanisms of mans social interactions by means of parley and face-to face encounters.Dramaturgy emphasizes the creation or projection of roles attempting to be congruous and accepted in the norms of society where a particular man or actor belongs in order to avoid ostracism and harmful divergence of the majority group at their backs (an manikin of backstage behavior). It also functions for man to rehearse and practice ones ideal goals for the purpose of portraying those roles into the stage or real world (frontstage behavior), and to be viewed by perceive viewers or onlookers (audience).The dramaturgy or dramaturgical perspective can be best understood by showing an example in some range of a functionl and professional situations. For instance, in a particular scenario, a play, an act or a drama occurs perhaps, a person encountering an friend or friend, may be forced in the situation to apostrophize the person coming nearby and may therefore reveal a phony or a fake smile in order for the other person not to think negatively about the person who is expected to greet.The second person on the other hand, would and might as well return the greetings back because of the perceived rightness of the act as implied by the social norms and equity rules. Moreover, these two different persons may execute and engage in a talk and communicate through non- communicatory gestures and of course, verbal language these persons then, may use or show a facial mask or a facade we call in psychology, the persona.In a professional situation however, a good example may be the HR interviewer and the applicator (interviewee) both would have to coiffe their assigned and implied roles as for the HR interviewer, has to appear intimidating, serious, and straightforward with less smiles, and for the applicants part, one has to act as the confident but not so arrogant and aggressive projected image to impress the interviewer and has to ac t that one knows what one is doing and the position applying for (Sannicolas, 1997). ConclusionFurther, it is concluded that the theory of dramaturgy explains the tendency of people to project rehearsed roles for the purpose of perfecting their interpersonal social skills. true(prenominal) or not, obsequious or assertive, mans mechanism is explained as such dominated by those internal ideal roles that is projected and performed outward by persons in social situations (Sannicolas, 1997). References Sannicolas, N. (1997). Erving Goffman, dramaturgy, and on-line relationships. Retrieved October 31, 2008, from, http//www. dinicola. it/sit/Cybersoc%20Issue%201%20-%20Erving%20Goffman,Dramaturgy,and%20On-Line%20Relationships. htm