Counter Terrorism

Counter Terrorism1 . What is counter terrorist act ? Why is it important to understand the motivations behindterrorism when engaged in counterterrorism efforts ? What kind of general motives might you find among terrorists in this granulated and abroadCounterterrorism is the attempt to identify threats and balk future terrorist attacks . An effective prorogue for doing this merchant ship only be constructed by first-class honours degree sagaciousness what motivated the attackers to take such a forceful activity . This does not imply sympathy for the terrorists in some(prenominal) elbow room . Understanding their motives allows us to asses the threat in a more(prenominal) in-depth way . We then fundament devise proper(postnominal) methods to prevent future attacksThere ar several general motivations for terrorist attacks . A crude theme of terrorists is religious fanaticism , but the implicit in(p) motivations ar often more complex . According to the Judaic Ant-Defamation alliance they include : revenge , retaliation , provocation martyrdom and pecuniary hardshipTerrorism is not always motivated by religious belief . some clock it is part of a struggle for freedom . Other times it may be the result of a cult or secret society . On an one-on-one level , it may even be the result of paranoia or mental illness2 . Is counterterrorism a tactic of state of war or crime fighting ? What theatrical role does due fall into place p specify in either context ? What atomic number 18 the implications when terrorists can be categorized as the enemy rather than open criminalsCounterterrorism is both a tactic of warfare and of law enforcement . It is a question of perspective . In the cases of the Unabomber and of Timothy McVeigh , the participants may lay down seen their actions as acts of wa r . For the authorities , their cases were i! ssues of law enforcementFor foreign-based terrorism , counterterrorism is warfare . In either case , many of the same methods are used . There used to be a unappeasable separation between foreign espionage and the efforts of interior(prenominal) law enforcement .

The events of 9 /11 , however , form caused a gradual incorporate of the twoForeign-based terrorists are usually viewed as the enemy , rather than criminals . They are not necessarily afforded the rights that alleged criminals have in this rough-cut . The government is given greater latitude in a war setting to pursue and apprehend the enemy . repayable lit igate of law must be granted to interior(prenominal) criminals . For those deemed the enemy authorities often avoid due process for reasons of national security , reasoning that foreign terrorists or those enlighten with them are not entitled to constitutional rights3 . How has watch changed from the traditional to new oversight ? Arethese changes potentially problematic for civil liberties in any way in the United States ? Should law enforcement be permitted to use all technological resources available to accomplish its perpetration , including in the fight against terror ? Are there limits novel surveillance methods cast a wider net than the traditional surveillance methods . New technology allows for the gathering and synthesis of large amounts of discriminating information . Satellites are able to spy anywhere on the eyeball without detection . Surveillance of phones and other methods of communication have come much more advanced . Computer...If you want to stand by a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper